Tuesday, June 12, 2018

Candidate Vetting-2018-from your elected delegates

Dear Highland 02 Republicans,

This election cycle we had 4 delegates vetting the candidates for US Senate (Mike Kennedy and Mitt Romney) and US House, District 3 (John Curtis and Chris Herrod)

I am listing their names and a link to the reviews that have been provided:

Wendy Hart, Precinct Chair: Candidate Review
Ruth White, Precinct Secretary: Candidate Review
John Dougall
Troy Dougall: Candidate Review



We also had 6 delegates vetting the candidates for:
Utah State House, District 27 (Brady Brammer and Jared Carman)
County Commission, Seat A (Tanner Ainge and Tom Sakievich)
County Sheriff (Jim Phelps and Mike Smith)
County Attorney (Chad Grunander and David Leavitt)

Here are our delegates and a link to their reviews:
Wendy Hart, Precinct Chair: Candidate Review
Devirl Barfuss, Precinct Vice-Chair: Candidate Review
Tim Heyrend: Candidate Review
Rod and Suzanne Mann: Candidate Review
Scott Smith

Thank you for electing us to represent you and to vet these candidates on your behalf. We hope that our insights will assist you in making good decisions as you exercise your right and your responsibility to vote.


Primary Candidates-2018-State Delegate White

From State Delegate Ruth White, who vetted the candidates for US Senate and US House, District 3.


As a state delegate, I vetted for two races, U.S. Senate and U.S. House of Representative. I enjoyed meeting with the candidates and participating in the caucus and the convention.
The Senate race is between Mike Kennedy and Mitt Romney.  I voted for Mike Kennedy as I have far more confidence that he is a strong conservative and will vote accordingly.  With his history in the Utah House of Representatives, he has a solid voting record that shows he is what he says he is.  Some examples of his stances are that he has consistently voted against tax increases and spending.  He is strongly against federal government expansion and intrusion such as with healthcare, education, and the Utah Public Lands issues in which he pointed out that the BLM has been militarized and is unaccountable to the people.  He is not voting for any process that encourages federal power over the people.  I saw Mike Kennedy in the debate, and at candidate meet and greet events as he talked with delegates.  I was impressed with how very even tempered his nature was.  He never got ruffled or hot under the collar from my fellow delegates, or his fellow candidates.  That ability will play well for him when he is dealing with a hostile media, or working in the shark tank of D.C.   He has demonstrated he is a solid conservative who’s shown he stands on principle even in the face of adversarial heat and pressure.
Mitt Romney did not participate in the candidate debate.  I attended a candidate meet and greet event for him on which he did most of the speaking and allowed minimal questions.  He is definitely charming and a skilled public speaker.  He addressed general republican principles but was a little difficult to pin down on specifics.  So it was a bit more challenging to get a clear picture on where he stands.  I referred to videos posted by fellow delegates of additional Romney events throughout the state in which my experience was reinforced. On occasion he’d get annoyed when he was pressed to be more specific which I think is silly and senseless.  Some points he made were that the states take care of issues such as the uninsured, transportation, education and that he would push back against the federal government to bring the obligation of those things back to the states.  He put a lot of stress on the budget and stated that because of his relations with other senators and politicians he will be able to get things done.  Although he could talk well, I have great concern that there isn’t a solid track record that demonstrates a conservative history consistent with his claims.   He has at times in the past supported liberal policies, liberal candidates and has flipped back and forth on issues depending on how he perceived the political winds to shift.  When my job is to vet a candidate to assure he will be loyal to the party platform, I cannot say I have confidence Romney will do that.  I also find his claim that he will be more influential than a junior Senator could be because of his national “clout” to be dubious and a weak qualifier.  Mike Lee went to D.C. as a junior senator, has stood on conservative principle and has been a strong voice in the Senate.  When the folks at home are more concerned with draining the swamp, Romney is pointing out that he’s one of the “elite” insiders.  How does this claim show he’s got what it takes to stand up against the “establishment” when principle is on the line? Unfortunately, this claim indicates the opposite to me.  While Mitt Romney has charm and is a good public speaker, I can’t say he is a principled candidate that we can trust to stand for Utah.
The  House race is between Chris Herrod and John Curtis.  I voted for Chris Herrod as I felt he was the candidate that was most solidly in-line with conservative principles and the party platform.  He also has his experience in the Utah House to back him up.  I spoke with Herrod at a candidate meet and greet.  He was very well versed, on any issue put before him and addressed them very matter-of-factly and in a straight forward manner.  Some examples of topics he addressed were immigration issues--supporting reforms to make legal immigration better while working to stop the influx of illegal immigration; state sovereignty in regards to public lands issues; education belonging at the local level, he was against any federal overreach, and supports President Trump’s conservative agenda.  Truly he is a straight shooter down the party platform and his knowledge had breadth and was indepth. I also meet with John Curtis at a candidate meet and greet.  He was well-spoken and smoother in his self-presentation than Herrod was.  He also is very well versed in subjects and took a great deal of time to meet with the delegates and to discuss concerns.  I noticed on occasion he used some clever evasive language to avoid taking the hard stance on some topics, such as on his choice to gather signatures; the need to stop illegal immigration, claiming to align with the President on the “broader goal” just not on the “how-tos”; and avoiding the stickiness of LGBT rights vs. religious liberty stating that society needs to work those issues out, but declining to say how society does that or how policy would be made. Curtis is a former democrat which makes me wonder about his convictions.  Hopefully it was a true conversion and not an electoral necessity but some things cause me to wonder such as those evasive answers.  He also claimed to vote “No” on the Omnibus spending bill that was passed but neglected to mention that prior to this vote, he voted “Yes” to move it from committee and bring it to the floor for debate and vote.  His subsequent “No” vote was useless and would have been more effective defeating the Omnibus bill in committee where the vote was close and his fellow republicans needed his support.  It was unfortunate that he departed from his colleagues when the real crucible was hanging in the balance in committee.  Curtis was an excellent public speaker, well versed and made a great deal of effort to talk to delegates. But it concerns me when he avoided some hard stances with carefully crafted non-committal answers.   Chris Herrod was definitely knowledgeable, being very well versed in every issue, always answered in a straight forward manner, and is a definitely a solid conservative.

Monday, June 11, 2018

Primary Candidates-2018-County Delegates Mann

Rod and Suzanne Mann were county delegates.  Here are their opinions on the County races.


County Attorney: Chad. I have spent quite a bit of time talking with him. I believe he is well qualified and is concerned about prosecutorial overreach. I have no issues with him despite the many critiques I heard

County Commissioner: Tom. He impressed us both. I believe he will work hard for us and try to do the right thing. His values are similar to ours. I actually think Tanner Ainge would be fine but I like Tom’s grey hairs and marine background.

County Sherriff: Jim Phelps. We both like Jim a lot. I like the fact that he has identified specific issues that he sees coming and how he wants to address them. I also really like his positive energy. Mike is well qualified but doesn’t give me the same positive vibe that I get from Jim.

Neither were State Delegates, but here is their opinion on the Senate race.

Senator: Mike Kennedy. No explanation required.

Primary Candidates-2018-County Delegate Heyrend

County Delegate Tim Heyrend shares his thoughts on the candidates.  He was not elected to vote for the US Senate Race but is happy to share his opinion on that race, as well.


I voted for:
Mitt Romney for Senate, due to his national experience, clout, and balanced budget ideas.

Jim Phelps for Sheriff, great experience all around and many years of service as a U.S. Marshall.

Brady Brammer for House, I worked with Brady on the Highland Planning Commission. He is a super smart attorney who gets the job done and stood up for our community values time and time again on the Commission. He has the drive to finalize the east west connector for us.

Tom Sakievich for County Commission. He is a sage, experienced conservative who understands the County government process.

Chad Grunader for County Attorney. Many Years of experience and successful prosecutions in the most difficult and heinous felony cases.

Best Regards,
Tim Heyrend

Primary Candidates-2018-State Delegate T. Dougall

Here is the opinion of State Delegate, Troy Dougall:

For the State Races of US Senate and US House, District 3:

I'm supporting Romney largely because the Senate is a close-knit body built on personal relations and I think Mitt has worked with, campaigned for, and fundraised for nearly every Republican Senator, therefore I think he will be more effective at pushing through choice policy than any normal senator.

For Curtis the main thing I would say is that he is by far the most accountable and accessible person in Utah’s delegation and likely more accessible and accountable than the heavy majority of Representatives. Most people may vote a certain way hoping that 2 years down the line they’ll have other accomplishments to campaign on to mask the bad vote and that people will largely forget the bad vote. For John if he has a bad vote, he’s going to be facing voters in a week or two and will have to explain himself. This, naturally, largely prevents him from bad voting and raises his level of accountability to the people. 


Troy is familiar with some of the County races and their candidates, and this is his opinion on those, even though he was not elected to vote in those races at Convention.

I would recommend Jared Carman over Brady Brammer.

I honestly like both Mike Smith and Jim Phelps but I've gotten multiple opportunities to talk to Jim Phelps in a friendly/non-political manner and he is extremely nice. 

I absolutely recommend Chad Grunander for County Attorney. I've been able to talk to him a lot (he lives in John Curtis's ward actually) and it sounds like he is the most experienced and has had an extensive history prosecuting high level crimes like homicide and drug trafficking.

Sunday, June 10, 2018

Primary Candidates--June 2018--Precinct Vice-Chair


Dear residents in the HI02 precinct,

You elected me to represent you at the Utah County Republican convention in April and I wanted to report back to you as to how and why I voted the way I did.

County Commission Seat A – Tom Sakievich verses Tanner Ainge
I voted for Tom. I believe the commission needs a disciplined and mature person who has high level, organizational and planning experience within a governmental bureaucracy.
Tom served thirty eight years in the United State Marine Corps, the last few years being responsible for restructuring a major section of the Corps, affecting 180,000 members and saving several hundred million dollars in the process.
Tanner, on the other hand, is a very bright, quick study and has highly developed evaluation skills as a venture capitalist and was, without question, the best debater in the field of six candidates.
The tipping point for me was when each candidate was asked to say something they admired about the candidate sitting next to them. Five struggled with this question but from Tom, the compliments flowed like an open floodgate. He demonstrated that he is a self-confident, people person who is comfortable praising the good qualities of even a competitor.

Utah House Seat, District 27 – Jared Carman versus Brady Brammer
I voted for Jared Carman. I looked for a candidate who exhibited the qualities that I admire in Mike Kennedy.
Jared is a successful entrepreneur (2 tech companies, 3 patents), helped the Utah legislators draft and pass pro-family legislation and has worked for years to ensure parents rights with regard to their children’s education. He has experience working directly with the legislature and understands the value of and the challenges that face small businesses. My support for Jared has increased as I have gotten to know him personally since the convention.
Brady Brammer, on the other hand, has years of service on the Highland City Planning Commission and is familiar with the legislative process. In truth, he has an impressive resume. The deal breaker for me was circumventing the caucus system by collecting signatures to ensure that he would be on the primary ballot in June, regardless of delegate preference.

County Sheriff – Mike Smith and Jim Phelps
I voted for Mike Smith. I talked with both candidates at length and both would be good but for different reasons. Mike is stronger in administrative experience and is well known and supported by many of his fellow police chiefs. Jim, on the other hand, has vast and varied experience working with other law enforcement agencies as a US Marshal. I got the impression that Jim may be too closely associated with the County Attorney’s office, a bit of an insider. Even though they have to work together, as a citizen, I prefer that they be as independent as possible. Mike appears to be one more step removed from the other branch of the justice system and that, I think, gives the average citizen greater protection and may reduce preferential treatment of insiders.

County Attorney – David Leavitt and Chad Grunander
I voted for David.
There are accusations that the County Attorney’s office has been over zealous in prosecuting some cases. The office has also vigorously resisted the attempts by the County Commissioners to investigate and/or regulate (hold accountable) the county attorneys. I understand the need to for independence but I also recognize arrogance. Chad is the assistant County Attorney today. He obviously comes with extensive experience with the office and as a local prosecutor but he, in my opinion, is tainted by the history of the office.
David, on the other, has extensive experience in other counties at the County Attorney level in both criminal prosecution and defending counties and municipalities. For me, this is a very attractive balance. The County Attorney needs experience in both disciplines in order to run a balanced office. David is also an “outsider” to the Utah County environment. And probably most important, I have great respect for the two attorneys who represented him at the open houses when David had scheduling conflicts.

State Races
I was not a state delegate but have personal experience with two of the four candidates running for Congress or US Senate.

US Senate
I support Mike Kennedy. I know him personally and his values align perfectly with mine. He did NOT collect signatures but allowed the delegates to interview him and let them decide who would best represent Utah’s interests. Mitt, on the other hand, did pay people to collect signatures, thus bypassing the caucus system. Mitt’s signature health care legislation, as Governor of MA, became the template for Obamacare. Mitt is an experienced and highly effective executive but I have reservations about his personal politics.

US Congressional Seat District 3
I know Chris Herrod personally and worked on his campaign a year ago. Again, his values align perfectly with mine. John lost badly in convention but because he paid to have signatures collected, he essentially bypassed the caucus system and forced Chris into a primary, which is where the man with the most money won.

Thank you for electing me to represent you at convention and I hope you agree that I voted for the right people for the right reasons. I welcome your comments because it is impossible for one person to know everything about every candidate.

Devirl Barfuss, Precinct Vice-Chair

Primary Candidates--June, 2018--Precinct Chair

Mail-in ballots have arrived!

Thank you for giving me the honor of representing you in vetting our primary candidates.  I think our local level is the most important for all politics because we should be able to meet, discuss, agree or disagree, and still be neighborly.  As your delegates, we have spent in some case 20 -40 hours meeting, grilling, and discussing issues with these candidates.  I encourage you to talk with your delegates and get their opinions on the candidates.  (A list of our delegates can be found below, so you know who to contact.  The opinions of the candidates expressed are mine alone.)  Whether you agree or disagree with the delegates' opinions, their insights will prove valuable in assisting you in making an informed decision.

We are fortunate to have great candidates who were willing to put their hats into the ring and offer themselves up as our representatives.

State Races (Delegates: John Dougall, Troy Dougall, Wendy Hart, Ruth White)

US Senate:  This is the most high-profile race on this ballot and is between Mike Kennedy and Mitt Romney.

I voted for Dr. Kennedy.

Dr. Mike Kennedy has been serving our area in the Utah State House for the past 6 years.  He has a very conservative voting record and sees our national debt as one of the biggest problems we face on a federal level.  Dr. Kennedy has seen, first-hand, the problems with the Affordable Care Act.  He is a strong defender of individual and parental rights, especially on the medical front.  He has been on the appropriations committees at the State Legislature and understands both personally, professionally, and politically how to prioritize and how to balance a budget.  He is supportive of many of the current policies, such as the recent Tax Cut, and he wants to return control of education to the local level.  He understands the importance of returning control of Utah's Public Lands to the state.  Dr. Kennedy did not gather signatures, wanting to leave his political fate in the hands of those who he had to convince face-to-face.  Personally, I have known Dr. Kennedy for the past 6 years and have worked with him closely as a legislator.  I know he is very opposed to Common Core and federal intervention in education.  He is always willing to listen to every position and consider the merits of those arguments.  Even those who disagree on policy acknowledge his willingness to be considerate and kind to everyone.  This isn't just a show, it is at the core of who he is.

Gov. Romney, as most know, was Governor of Massachussets and a candidate for the US Presidency.  He is very well-known, nationally, and in political circles.  He was an "adopted son" during the 2002 Winter Olympics, when he took over after the scandal that plagued the beginnings of those games.  Initially, during the Meet the Candidates, there were not too many opportunities to ask questions directly of Candidate Romney.  As those events continued, a few more questions did come to light.  Mr. Romney seemed to learn quickly what the issues in Utah were; however, the Public Lands concerns were never addressed to my satisfaction.  Also, I had concerns about healthcare mandates, and as the author of the blueprint for the Affordable Care Act.  Mr. Romney does know people in DC and does have a lot of influence.  Gov. Romney gathered signatures to guarantee he was on the primary ballot.

I am unsure that Mr. Romney understands Utah's issues as well as Dr. Kennedy.  I think if he is advised by those who share your issues, he will vote correctly, but if not, I am unsure how he would vote.  I had hoped to get a greater understanding of Gov. Romney during the candidate meetings, but most of them were not as question-and-answer as the other candidates in all the other races.  Because of this, I know the public persona, but can't speak to anything else.  I had hoped for that not to be the case.

US Congress, District 3:  John Curtis and Chris Herrod

I voted for Mr. Herrod in convention to force a primary.  I am leaning toward supporting Mr. Curtis in the primary.

Mr. Curtis is our incumbent and has been for just a handful of months.  However, in those few months, I have been pleased with his votes.  Rep. Curtis joked, "I was in Congress for 2 days, and the House passed tax reform!"  (Many laughs.)  He voted against the Omnibus spending bill.  He understands the issue with public lands.  He's strong on border security but isn't sure he agrees with the President on the wall.  But he does agree with him on the goal of border security, including ports, airports, etc.  He has voted against deregulation.  His view on DACA is we need to add certainty to their lives, but continue with stronger borders. On Affordable Care Act, we need to not see insurance as a way to pay for basics, and supported removing the penalty for not having insurance.  He supported the Tax Cuts.  What I appreciated the most about Rep. Curtis was his accessibility and his willingness to talk with people, especially those who disagreed with him.  When he was in DC, he had tele-townhalls every evening till 8pm our time/ 10pm his time.  Since convention, he has had multiple events around our district, and his outreach to the people he represents is second to none.  I think when you hear the concerns of those you represent, you are better able to make wise decisions on their behalf.  Rep. Curtis gathered signatures to guarantee he was on the primary ballot.

Mr. Herrod has served in the Utah State Legislature and is very strong on the County Republican Platform.  He is consistent with the principles articulated there, and I have been very supportive of those principles.  Mr. Herrod is strong on border security and understands the great need we have to fix our legal immigration system.  As the husband of a legal immigrant, he has seen first-hand the brokenness of that process.  If we could fix legal immigration, then we would be able to make it easier for people to come in through the front door, as it were.  Mr. Herrod is opposed to Common Core and federal involvement in education.  However, he was not as available for delegate meetings as Mr. Curtis.  Mr. Herrod did not gather signatures.

County Races: (Delegates: Devirl Barfuss, Wendy Hart, Tim Heyrend, Rod Mann, Suzanne Mann, Scott Smith)

Utah House of Representatives, District 27: Brady Brammer and Jared Carman

I voted for Mr. Carman.

Both candidates support the East-West Corridor going through (road from just south of Lone Peak to the Alpine Highway), local curriculum decisions made in education, and think there is too much involvement from the state legislature in the local schools.  Both have been involved in drafting and working to pass legislation.  Both are supportive of families and religious freedom.

Mr. Brammer is an attorney who has represented cities and other governmental entities.  He is a Highland resident and currently serves on the Highland Planning Commission.  He is well-spoken and has great ideas on regaining public lands.  On Common Core, he believes that locally-based decisions should be made on curriculum (which is currently done).  He thinks there are too many education bills in the legislature every year.  He doesn't pretend to be an expert in the public school system, so he would leave that to the experts at the local level.  He said that in the process of making laws, it's important to understand how the implementation of those laws impact people.  He feels his experience level is broader than his opponent and more relevant.  He is in support of the caucus process but also feels the signature path is a good thing.  He gathered signatures to guarantee a place on the primary ballot.

Mr. Carman is a small business owner and Highland resident.  As a volunteer on the State Instructional Materials Commission, he has spent time evaluating textbooks and other materials for the state of Utah. He has lobbied tirelessly on both a state and a federal level for parental rights and freedom from top-down mandates, especially in education.  Mr. Carman understands small business and the burdens placed on businesses at the state-level.  On Common Core, Mr. Carman has been active in opposing it and trying to bring better math and English standards back to Utah.  He is concerned with the amount of micro-managing of education done at the state and federal level.  Mr. Carman also testified at the State Legislature in favor of a bill (that eventually passed) to prohibit the state from using SAGE scores as part of a teacher's evaluation.  He supports the caucus and did not gather signatures.  He recognizes that having to speak one-on-one with delegates requires a greater depth and breadth of understanding.  The caucus process also allows those without lots of political backing but good ideas and principles to run for office.

My take: With the number of education bills and the large percentage of the state budget going toward education, having someone who has been instrumental in following both the federal and the state mandates in education would be very beneficial.  We have too many people in the legislature who "defer to the education experts" instead of to their constituents.  Too much time and money is spent at the state level trying to control education, and the "best" ideas all seem to fail and get rebranded over time.  Mr. Carman has seen this revolving door multiple times and is poised against it.  I recognize that not every bill is an education bill, but every bill deals with individual rights and many have a direct impact on families.  Mr. Carman is very attuned to seeing the ramifications from that perspective.

County Sheriff: Jim Phelps and Mike Smith

I voted for Officer Phelps.  Both candidates gathered signatures guaranteeing them a place on the ballot.

Officer Phelps has been with the US Marshall's office and has worked extensively in Salt Lake.  He has seen the problems in Salt Lake and wants to prevent them from coming to Utah County.  He understands the role of sheriff is to protect individual rights but also to maintain the law.  He was involved in drafting legislation to remove policing power from the Bureau of Land Management personnel in Utah.  He is a strong defender of the Second Amendment, and understands the role a sheriff plays in maintaining freedom for the individuals in his purview.  He is not comfortable with the strings that come from federal funds.  He stated his first act as sheriff will be to request an audit before recommending whether to request an increase in the budget or not.

Chief Smith is the Chief of Police in Pleasant Grove City.  He is involved in many community policing activities, including a citizens' academy that trains citizens as police officers and allows them to simulate police calls.  He also advocates for a program where individual officers are assigned to specific areas and are asked to take a more personal interest in that part of the community.  While I think these things are good things, I am unsure that they are that necessary in Utah County.  Chief Smith would advocate for an increase in the budget with the County Commissioners.  When asked about taking federal money with federal strings, his response was that federal grants pay for the officers' vests and that it's important that tax money that we all pay and send to DC comes back to be used at home, e.g. the vests.

County Commission, Seat A: Tanner Ainge and Tom Sakievich

I voted for Mr. Sakievich.

Mr. Ainge ran for Congress this past year.  He is very well organized.  He took the initiative to meet with the heads of all the county departments and find out their issues when he decided to run.  He is enthusiastic and very capable.  He wants to change legislation to allow for greater property taxes to come to the locals in order to keep up with inflation.  He is in favor of a county tax increase.  Mr. Ainge gathered signatures to guarantee a place on the primary ballot.

Mr. Sakievich is a retired Marine Corps veteran and spent time involved in a restructuring plan for the Corps that saved many millions of dollars.  He is very concerned with fiscal spending and thinks there may be ways to restructure and become more efficient.  He felt one of the best ways to handle Utah County's growth is to work with the mayors and city councils in coordination.  Most of the growth in the County is under their jurisdiction.  So, the commission is in more of a coordinating position.  He is generally opposed to giving tax incentives in a growing community.  Mr. Sakeivich  did not gather signatures.

County Attorney: Chad Grunander and David Leavitt

I voted for Mr. Leavitt.

Mr. Grunander currently works in the County Attorney's office.  He understands the ins and outs of things as they are currently run.  He has a tough on crime attitude.  When asked why the County Attorney position was a partisan, elected position, he said it was because it was constitutional, but wasn't sure it should be elected and didn't think it should be partisan.  He stipulated that just because it is a partisan office doesn't mean people are targeted based on politics.  (This is a good thing to hear.) One of the concerns with the current County Attorney's office is the allegation that they charge for crimes at a level higher than the crime deserves and plea it down.  This increases the amount of convictions, if true.  I have some evidence to believe this occurs.  How often, I do not know.

Mr. Leavitt used to be the Juab County Attorney.  He is focused on not just the prosecutorial side of the attorney's office but also the civil advisory side, as the attorney for every elected official or board in the county.  He explained that as an elected official, his job is to serve the people of this county, and even if you are arrested and charged with a crime, he is still your servant.  Being your servant, he may still need to prosecute you, but you should not be treated disparagingly.  He commented that the judicial system exists to protect the people from a tyrannical executive, and juries exist to protect the people from a tyrannical judiciary.

I am grateful to you for electing me to serve in this capacity, to vet these candidates and to report back to you.  I am convinced that we get better candidates when they have to face average citizens and answer questions about their principles and their desire to serve.

Wendy Hart, Precinct Chair

Friday, March 23, 2018

2018 Pre-Convention Calendar

Sat., Mar. 24, 7:30am - 9:00 am: Meet the Candidates (Noah Webster Academy 205 E 400 S, Orem, UT 84058)
Sat., Mar. 24, 9:00 am - 10:00 am: Delegate Training (Noah Webster Academy 205 E 400 S, Orem, UT 84058)


For County Delegates:
Wed., Apr. 4: 6:30 pm - 8:00 pm Meet the Candidates (Springville Junior High School 189 S 1470 E, Springville, UT 84663)
Wed., Apr. 4: 8:00 pm - 9:00 pm Sheriff Debate (also, Springville JH)

Tue., Apr. 10: 6:00 pm - 7:45 pm Meet the Candidates (Lehi Junior High School 700 E Cedar Hollow Rd, Lehi, UT 84043)
Tue., Apr. 10: 7:45 pm - 8:45 pm Commissioner Debate (also, Lehi JH)

Sat., Apr. 14: 7:00 am - 2:00 pm COUNTY CONVENTION (Timpview High School 3570 Timpview Dr, Provo, UT 84604)  Please bring water and snacks, but they have been getting food trucks to come, as well, in the past.  I assume that will continue.


For State Delegates:
Sat., Apr. 21: 7:00 am - 2:00 pm: STATE CONVENTION (Maverik Center 3200 Decker Lake Dr, Salt Lake City, UT 84119)

Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Final 2014 Caucus Information

As you may know the Republican Caucus meeting is coming up this Thursday, March 20th. It will be held at Ridgeline Elementary School (6250 W 11800 N, Highland, UT 84003) in the cafeteria. We will be the only precinct there and so there should be plenty of room for everyone. The formal meeting starts at 7 PM. Candidates and precinct members are invited to come and 6 to meet and mingle. Please come at least 20 minutes early so that we can take care of registration and start on time.

There are some important rule changes that you should be aware this year.
  • You can preregister for the meeting, which will greatly reduce the sign-in process and I encourage everyone to do so. Here is the link: https://voterclick.com/utgop_menu.php. Our precinct name is HI02.
  • You can also use this same link to file for office (chair, vice-chair, secretary, treasurer, state delegate, or county delegate). As of the moment no one has filed file office. You can also nominate yourself for office at the caucus.The current officers are not planning on running again. If you have not been a delegate before please consider running. It is a great experience and one I believe everyone would benefit from doing. If you have the time and interest please consider running. I have posted "job descriptions" for all positions on our precinct blog, http://www.highlandprecinct2.blogspot.com, along with more detailed information about the Caucus system.
  • Another significant rule change is that Republicans currently residing in our precinct who is unable to attend (can't find a babysitter, has a conflict with another activity, ...) can vote in abstentia. He or she will need to print out a ballot within 24 hrs of the meeting ( from the same link I provided to preregister), write in the names of the candidates you want to support for precinct officers and delegates, (pick up to 3 state and 5 county delegates), put the ballot in an envelop, seal it, sign it, and make a copy of valid government issued ID (drivers license or passport). The sealed and signed envelop along with ID copy can be given to a trusted person who will be attending the caucus. They will give the registration person assigned to deal with absentee ballots. The registrar will compare the signature on the envelop with the ID, give the ID back, open the envelop and ensure that it is a valid ballot (one was printed in the last 24 hours),  then place the ballot in an absentee ballot container and discard the envelop. Please note, one person can bring up to a maximum of three absentee ballots.
  • Those members of our precinct who are living outside of Utah because they are doing religious service or who are serving in the military can also vote by sending an email to both the precinct chair (Rod Mann, mannrw@gmail.com) AND the vice chair (Brent Cook, brentmcook@gmail.com) letting us know their circumstances and giving us a list of the candidates whom they want to support. This will need to be sent 72 hours prior to the Caucus meeting.
If you want to review the complete 2014 caucus rules click here. Let me also mention that while I know that losing is not fun (yes I have run and lost) it can be a catalyst to get better organized next time and actually motivate someone to be more involved. So please don't be afraid to put yourself out there. If your personal  circumstances are conducive to serving (e.g. you are planning on serving a mission in the near future) then find someone who you think would represent you well and encourage them to run. As I said at the moment I know of no one who is absolutely committed to running for any of the offices or delegate positions and I do know that those of us serving do not intend to run again. 


This will be a fun evening. We will have some questions to ask and small prizes to distribute while votes are being counted. We can also discuss local issues while votes are being counted since our precinct is over-weighted on city council, again, with 2 members currently serving (Jessie Schoenfeld and myself) and at least 3 former members (Scott Smith, Brent Cook, and Glen Vawdrey) plus a former mayor (Jesse Adamson).

Have a great week and I look forward to seeing you on Thursday.

Saturday, March 15, 2014

2014 Precinct Caucus Meetings Overview

Overview
Caucus meetings will be held this year in preparation for primary and general elections in Utah. These precinct caucus meetings are a grassroots level of political involvement in Utah and are best served by a broad representation of Utah citizens. Those who attend play a critical role in selecting candidates for public office.

The 2014 caucus meetings will be held on Tuesday, March 18 and Thursday, March 20, and we encourage our members to participate as an exercise of their civic responsibility and privileges.

Why do caucus meetings take place?
Utah’s system is close to the people and rewards engagement. Neighbors come together to select representatives (called delegates) from their own neighborhoods. These people are the official representatives of the views and wishes of the voting precinct within their chosen party. These delegates attend the conventions and cast votes to select candidates to run in general and primary elections on behalf of their political party. These delegates also vote on the content of the party platforms and governing documents (each party has a county, state and national platform).


Friday, March 14, 2014

2014 Open Federal, State and County Offices

State and County Delegates will have a chance to help select Republican candidates for the following State and County offices in 2014.  The filing period for these office is Friday March 14th through Thursday March 20th. This post will be updated to include the filed candidates on Friday March 21st.

Office Candidates Selected by State Delegates
  • US Congress 3rd District:
  • State Attorney General:
Office Candidates Selected by County Delegates
  • Utah House of Representatives (District 27):
  • Utah County Commissioner Seat A:
  • Utah County Commissioner Seat B:
  • Utah County Assessor:
  • Utah County Attorney:
  • Utah County Clerk/Auditor:
  • Utah County Recorder:
  • Utah County Sheriff:
  • Utah County Surveyor:
  • Utah County Treasurer:


Wednesday, March 05, 2014

2014 Precinct Officer Duties and Responsibilities

PRECINCT CHAIR
A Republican Precinct Chair directs Republican Party affairs within the voting precinct.  A Precinct Chair is elected in each precinct at the neighborhood caucus, which is held in even-numbered years (usually during the third week of March).  Precinct Chairs serve 2-year terms.  In Utah County, the Precinct Chair acts as a State and a County Delegate.  Precinct Chair responsibilities include:
  • Presiding over voting precinct caucus.
  • Directing voter registration and any fund-raising within the precinct.
  • Organizing and directing Republican poll-watching and voter turn-out programs within the precinct.
  • Assisting Republican Party nominees’ campaigns within the precinct.
  • Serving as a member of the Utah County Central Committee (the governing body of the Utah County Republican Party) and attending quarterly committee meetings.
  • Publicly support only Republican candidates for partisan public office.
  • Endorsing the principles contained in the Utah County Republican platform.

Monday, March 03, 2014

2014 Delegate Duties and Responsibilities

ALL DELEGATES
  • Be a registered, affiliated Republican, having on file your name, telephone number, mailing address, and email address.
  • Be a resident of the Utah County voting precinct or legislative district you are elected to represent.
  • Be at least 18 years old by the November 4, 2014, General Election.
  • After being elected, attend legislative district training meetings for further instruction.
  • Willingly receive and act upon communications from the UTGOP, elected officials and GOP candidates.
  • Help distribute campaign literature and post signs.
  • Educate yourself about all the candidates. Expect to receive from campaign mail, emails, phone calls, invitations, etc. during their campaigns. Study the material they send.
  • Attend “Meet the Candidate” events and take other opportunities to listen to and become acquainted with candidates, in preparation for the yearly conventions.
  • Be available to precinct members to discuss candidates and share your thoughts and views via meetings, email, Facebook, and Blogs.
  • Serve the precinct you represent for two years.
  • As part of the precinct leadership, work to advance the goals of the precinct.
  • Enjoy your service to your fellow citizens and the new friends you will make in the process!

Monday, June 11, 2012

Central Committee Minutes 9 June 2012

Before I share the minutes I want to say that this was a great meeting; the best one I’ve attended yet.

Brent Cook and I attended along with about 200 other people. After the meeting opening the chair asked for new Precinct Chairs and Vice-Chairs to stand.  It looked to me as if as if half the audience stood up.

Here are my brief notes:

  • On Saturday October 20th the county will hold a breakfast and literature pick-up event. Each precinct is expected to send representative to pick up campaign literature for the Republicans running to be distributed within the precinct. We will be asking for volunteers. Please consider that this can be a family event/service project. I have good memories of handing out literature with my father as a young boy.
  • We approached an initial budget of $2,600 for a scholarship program for youth. The county will be sponsoring a video and speech contest on the topic of “the party platform” and/or why it is good to be a Republican. A number of ideas were mentioned such as rather than using age use year in school. Breaking into to groups; high school and fresh/sophomores in college (this was Brent’s). A committee will work out the details but everyone was excited about the idea.
  • Creating a county Teenage Republicans (TARS) club was also discussed. A long-term goal would be to have clubs in the high schools.
  • On Saturday Feb 2, 2013 will be holding its Lincoln Day dinner fund raiser. The county is looking for volunteers to help organize and promote this event. This years Lincoln day dinner cost $37K and cost $10K to put on.
  • County Finances: We have about $50K in the bank, most of which will be allocated to support our candidates (local candidates only—state leg and senate, county commissioners  …) in the general election.
  • About 45 minutes we devoted to training and reviewing how the party operates. Something that we previously never had time to do.
  • We also heard from some of the Republican candidates for this falls general election (those that did not have a primary) including Mia Love who will be running against Jim Matheson in the nearly created 4th district. Although, we are in the 2nd I would encourage all to consider supporting her in some way.

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Primary 2012 Information

Important Dates

  • Voter Registration Forms must be to the elections office by May 29th. Click here to get Registration form.
  • Absentee Ballots must be requested no later than June 22nd for domestic and June 6th for overseas. Click here to get Absentee ballot form.
  • Primary date Tuesday June 26th @ Lone Peak High School.

Candidates

US Senate:

State Attorney General

State Auditor

State House District 27

County Commissioner Seat C

Monday, April 16, 2012

Make Your Voice Heard and Your Opinion Count at Public Hearing Tuesday April 17 Highland City Hall City Council Chambers

The following email was sent my Larry Mendenhall in response to the unsigned letter entitled “Open Letter to Highland Residents”. That was distributed last week. It is well work a read.

From: Larry Mendenhall <larrym30@msn.com>

Date: April 15, 2012 9:33:10 PM MDT

Subject: Make Your Voice Heard and Your Opinion Count at Public Hearing Tuesday April 17 Highland City Hall City Council Chambers

There will be a public hearing held Tuesday, April 17, 2012, at 7:00 p.m. at the City Hall, regarding SUNDAY Business Opening and other related municipal code modifications.

Please attend and make your voice heard. 

I was the Chairman of the Planning Commission when the Highland Market Place development (the NE corner of SR92 & SR74) was approved.  At the time of approval the developer fully understood and acknowledged that Sunday Closing was a requirement by code as well as a Community Standard. Now, in the name of jump starting development and making Highland a less 'difficult place to do business', forces are gathering to change the development and municipal code to allow businesses to be open on Sunday.

Highland has a well established Community Standard prohibiting and limiting Sunday Opening.  This Community Standard, I believe, is a standard shared by the majority of the residents of Highland regardless of religious affiliation.

The residents of Highland all received the "Open Letter to the Citizens of Highland".   This letter is very cleverly written.   I have been asked if this letter came from Highland City. It absolutely did not.  Mayor Lynn Ritchie has the integrity and courage to sign any information letter sent from the City of Highland in communication with the residents.

This "Open Letter to the Residents of Highland" was not signed.  There is no indication in the heading of the letter or in the body of the identity of the sender(s).  Only a coward or someone who has an urgent need to promote Sunday Opening and wishes to maintain anonymity sends a letter of this nature unsigned. 

Further.....This a letter couples the urgent need for road funds with the premise that sales taxes generated by new businesses in the commercial areas
of Highland City will reduce or eliminate the need for property tax.  There has been no formal analysis or a pro-forma produced by a reliable source which projects the increase in sales tax revenue if Sunday Opening were allowed nor has any projected property tax increase been made available.

The open letter is a "scare" letter.   No hard accurate numbers have been made available to back up claims made in the letter.  Let's get the facts ahead of the legislative action.

If you take the opportunity to speak in the Public Hearing on Tuesday please urge the City Council  to continue the item until such time as accurate bona fide information is available so that an informed decision can be made.

A note in closing......This matter came before the Planning Commission labeled "by request of the City Council".   There was no action by the City Council as a body to ask the
Planning Commission to review the Sunday Closing ordinance.  The request came from two City Council members who, to my understanding, suggested that the request be
labeled a "request by the City Council".   I am concerned with the lack of openness and transparency in the initial request to bring the matter before the Planning Commission,
in the "Open Letter to the Citizens of Highland", in the description in the City Council Agenda "Amending the Highland City Municipal Code Section 5.04.170 Hours of Operation
removing the restriction regarding days of operation.
  While the language does, in fact, state the purpose of the change it would have been much more open and transparent if the language made reference to Sunday Opening.

Please forward this e-mail to all who have an interest in being part of the governing process and urge them to attend the Tuesday City Council Meeting/Public hearing.

Thanks,
Larry Mendenhall, Highland Resident
larrym30@msn.com
801-372-5544

Wednesday, March 07, 2012

2012 Delegate Duties and Responsibilities:

ALL DELEGATES
  • Be a registered, affiliated Republican, having on file your name, telephone number, mailing address, and email address.
  • Be a resident of the Utah County voting precinct or legislative district you are elected to represent.
  • Be at least 18 years old by the November 6, 2012, General Election.
  • After being elected, attend legislative district training meetings for further instruction.
  • Willingly receive and act upon communications from the UTGOP, elected officials and GOP candidates.
  • Help distribute campaign literature and post signs.
  • Educate yourself about all the candidates. Expect to receive from them mailings, emails, phone calls, invitations, etc. during their campaigns. Study the material they send.
  • Attend “Meet the Candidate” events and take other opportunities to listen to and become acquainted with them, in preparation for the yearly conventions.
  • Serve the precinct you represent for two years.
  • As part of the precinct leadership, work to advance the work of the precinct.
  • Enjoy your service to your fellow citizens and the new friends you will make in the process!

STATE DELEGATES

  • Attend and participate in the 2012 Utah Republican Party State Convention on Saturday, April 21, 2012, at South Towne Expo Center in Sandy.
  • Be prepared to cast an informed vote for the Party's nominees for the following elected offices: Governor/Lt. Governor, Attorney General, State Auditor, State Treasurer, United States Senate, U.S. House of Representatives, National Committeeman and Committeewoman, National Delegates, Presidential Electors, Alternate National and Presidential Electors.
  • You may also be voting in multi-county State Legislative races.
  • At the convention you may also debate and vote on changes to the State Party Constitution, Bylaws, Platform, Rules of the Convention and Resolutions.
  • Attend the 2013 State Organizing Convention where the State Party Officers will be selected by the State Delegates.

COUNTY DELEGATES

  • Attend and vote at the 2012 County Nominating Convention at Timpview High School, 3570 N 650 E in Provo, and the 2013 County Organizing Convention.
  • Be prepared to cast informed votes for the Party's nominees for the following elected offices: Utah House of Representatives, Utah County Commissioner Seat C and some State Senate races--those where the Senate District falls entirely within the County boundaries and the seat is up for election this cycle.
  • Attend the 2013 County Organizing Convention where County Party Officers will be selected by County Delegates. Those officers include: Utah County GOP Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary, Treasurer and State Central Committee members. At the Organizing Convention you may also ratify or reject decisions of Central Committee and vote on resolutions.

Monday, October 17, 2011

Questions for Candidates

Election season is fast approaching and as we begin to decide who to support for various offices I’d like to share some of my thoughts on that topic.

Running-for-Office_thumb2When we elect someone to public office we are entrusting them to make decisions on our behalf using information to which we often don’t have access. That being the case I’m more interested in the quality of their character than a specific policy position that may change as an office holder gets access to additional information.

Here are 5 questions that will not be asked of candidates in public debate, but which I seek answers to when evaluating candidates. Some of these are best answered (e.g. #2) by people who know the candidate rather than the candidate:

Saturday, September 24, 2011

Central Committee Meeting 23 Sept 2011

The Central Committee (precinct chairs & vice chairs) met today in what for me was one of the most productive meetings I have attended. Members were elected of two committee (audit and by-laws/constitution). There were the same number of candidates as positions for the audit committee so all were elected by acclimation. For the constitution and by-laws committee however there were several more candidates than positions so each candidate was given 90 seconds to introduce themselves and then we voted. The following people were elected to serve on this committee (in order of votes -- highest to lowest):
  • Diane Christensen
  • Kristen Chevrier (former member)
  • Lisa Shepherd (former County Secretary)
  • Kirby Glad (former member and chair)
  • Dan Forward
  • Paul Baltes
  • Norman Jackson
In a close vote (88 to 85) we adopted a policy of selecting members of the state central committee by apportioning a number of positions (5 to 10 per district depending on size) to each senate district and then when at the country organizing convention when we divide into senate districts voting on them. The current process is to select on 20 members in on shot. There are typically 50 to 70 candidates who simply parade in front of the convention attendees and then we vote. By dividing into senate districts to select state committee members the thinking is that we will have more time to review a fewer number of candidates and can thus make more a more informed decision. I emphatically support this change.

We voted to allow on the precinct chairs to appoint replacements to state and county delegates within  their precincts. Previously, leg district chairs were allowed to make the replacements as well in contradiction to the State GOP Constitution.

We also voted to allow a proposals to be discharged from the by-laws and constitution committee if a petition to do so is signed by 50 committee members. Previously proposals could only reach the Central Committee after review and approval by the Constitution and By-laws committee and the Executive Committee

The previous two proposal were approved by wide margins in voice votes.

We were also asked to fill out a detailed survey indicating our thoughts what if any positions should be eligible for ex-officio delegate state (e.g. precinct chairs are automatically state and county delegates). This is a contentious and the By-laws and Constitution Committee is trying to put an amendment together that best represents the position of those opposed to some ex-officio delegates. I am perfectly OK with the current policy as I believe that it provides an incentive for those who serve on county committees or hold leg district positions (elected and appointed) to take time out of their lives to fill these roles.

An editorial note here is that my feeling is that those who oppose ex-officio delegates will continue to adamantly fight against them even if we vote (as has been done previously) to maintain them. And this will continue to be a contentious and time-wasting issue. I hope I am wrong.

Becky Lockhart (Speaker of the House) and Kurt Bramble (State Senator) also spoke to us and let us know where redistricting stands. Here is a summary of their messages:
  • Utah county will most likely have 5 Senate Districts (a couple of them will include portions of other counties
  • Our leg district boundaries will be changed. Most likely it will consist of Highland and Alpine plus Cedar Hills.

Sunday, May 01, 2011

County Organizing Convention 2011

Your County Delegates all attended the County Organizing Convention. This event is to designed to elect the officers and individuals to 'organize' the County party for the next 2 years. In particular, this year is very critical. These individuals will be in place for the 2012 election cycle.


I personally was impressed with the significant number of citizens in our county who were willing to run for these volunteer offices. They are individuals like you, who have families and jobs that make their lives busy. Yet, they all felt a need to step-up and serve as they are as concerned as many of you about the course and direction our country is headed into.


There were several things that the delegates experienced yesterday.





Our Senate Caucus (SD 11) hear from several speakers. We first heard from our House Representative, John Dougall (pictured here with Senator Valentine). His main topic was HB 116 and immigration at large. The delegates asked questions and made comments expressing their views on this topic.




Representative Ken Sumsion then spoke on the topic of Redistricting. (There is a meeting at the capital When » May 4, 9 a.m. in Room 30, House Building (west office building behind the Capitol) for public input). In the next few weeks, there will be an online application that will allow citizens to try to draw redistricting lines and bring their feedback to the committee in charge.




The delegates then heard from Representative Jason Chaffetz and Senator Mike Lee. Both had concerns about the mounting debt and they shared reasons why they voted against the recent $38 billion compromise. Senator Lee commits to voting against raising the debt ceiling. He states that the gloomy forecast just isn't reality. He stated that the Fed will continue to make our debt payments with or without raising the debt ceiling. He stated that concern would only arise if the Fed stopped making payments.


There are many solutions to our debt situation that are being considered with one requiring Congress to prioritize what gets paid first (Debt, Military, Entitlements, then other programming).





Governor Herbert was also present. He addressed the audience twice. Once in defense of HB 116 and the 2nd time highlighting what is right in Utah. He alluded to the suit Utah filed against the Federal Government in regard to the Wild Lands issue. He also stated that Utah's financial standing is the best in the nation and the Utah leads the way in so many areas.





Senator Orrin Hatch and State Senator Howard Stephensen were there in spirit. Reportedly, Senator Hatch was en route by plane but was not able to arrive in time. Senator Stephenson's mother passed away and the funeral was Saturday Morning.


There were several resolutions that were voted on. The most controversial was the resolutions against HB116. Before the vote, each side of the issue was shared by representatives from the state. The vote was close 443-365 in favor or asking legislators to repel this bill. For more information, please see this article in the Salt Lake Tribune.


To see all the resolutions presented please go to this link.




Final results for Utah County Leadership are (after the 2nd vote):


Chair
David Acheson 505 62.89%
Dave Duncan 298 37.11%

Vice Chair
Adrielle Herring 470 53.23%
Lisa Shepherd 413 46.77%

Secretary
Jeremy Roberts 404 51.20%
Kristen Chevrier 385 48.80%

Treasurer
Scott Bell 451 51.08%
Lisa Jensen 246 27.86%
Steven Reid 168 19.03%
Don Larsen 18 2.04%


To see the results of the elected members of the State Central Committee, please go here. (Each delegate could vote for up to 20 individuals out of a field of 68)




Your delegates served you well. Thank you for the opportunity you have giving us to represent you. Considering running as a delegate in the 2012 Caucus', its an experience everyone really should have!

Friday, April 22, 2011

County Convention is April 30th








The 2011 Utah County Republican Party Convention will be held on April 30th at Maple Mountain High School in Spanish Fork. Many individuals are contacting your County Delegates to plea for their votes. As constituents, you may want to know what the topics and who the individuals are who are running for office. Please, please write you comments below or send them to hi02precinctsecretary@gmail.com and I will forward them on to the delegates. Your input is critical and we would appreciate hearing what you have to say!



See this link for more information on who is running and the issues at hand. Please make your voice known!














Friday, February 04, 2011

How much is $100 Million?

If you took the opportunity to hear the State of the Union Address by President Obama recently, he stated that we need to reduce spending and the deficit. He essentially stated that he and his staff were going to find $100 Million Dollars to cut from the budget. How much is that really? See the video below.....visual aides really do help in this situation.


Friday, December 10, 2010

Round Table Freshman Caucus with Congressman Jason Chaffetz

Dear Constituents, we recently received this information and wanted to share it with you. All are welcome. HI02 Secretary
Round Table Freshman Caucus
with Congressman Jason Chaffetz

Question: If you had the opportunity to meet extensively with some newly-elected Freshman Congressmen before they headed off to Washington, is there anything you would want to tell them?

Answer: I'll bet you would! On Saturday December 18th, iCaucus is hosting a “Round Table Freshman Caucus” for several of the 2010 freshman-elect Congressmen and Senators to meet with Congressman Jason Chaffetz, as well as several guest experts; and with grassroots activists and citizens such as yourself.

We are especially pleased that one of our SPECIAL guest experts will be Anita Moncrief, the ACORN whistle blower who courageously exposed ACORN's massive voter fraud while working at ACORN.

Please Reserve your spot as early as possible: This is only one day and an opportunity you do not want to miss. Your early RSVP allows us to adequately prepare the logistical details for this Round Table!

Where: Challenger School in Lehi (behind Cabela's) 3920 N Traverse Mountain Boulevard Lehi UT 84043

When: Saturday, December 18th, 2010 Begins at 9:00am and runs through 4:30pm, with a Town Hall lunch.

The iCaucus Freshmen Round Table will consist of 3 elements, as outlined below:

1st element: KEYNOTE CAUCUS SESSION:

Congressman Jason Chaffetz (UT-3) will be our keynote "guest speaker". Congressmen Chaffetz is excited to meet and connect with grassroots activists and the Freshman Congressmen to take a unified message to Washington DC … instead of the other way around. I put "guest speaker" in quotes because Congressmen Chaffetz won't be giving us a speech, instead the format of Chaffetz’ time with you will be a combination of a townhall format with a "let’s roll up our sleeves and talk around the table" type of meeting.

2nd element: ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION SERIES:

In addition to meeting with Congressman Chaffetz, you will also attend a series of Round Table discussions with expert resources that have agreed to come and meet with you and the freshmen Congressmen.

Session 1 – Solutions for Effectively Reaching Minority Voters: Presented by Anita Moncrief, American Majority, ACORN Whistle blower, Washington DC

http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-washington-dc/anita-moncrief

Session 2 – Solutions for our Federal Deficit and Debt Reduction:

The Media and the status quo in Washington have framed our budget problems as a series of false choices: Either we must raise taxes, (they say), or enact draconian budget cuts, or default on our obligations, or raise the debt ceiling. The founders of The Independence Caucus categorically reject these 4 false options, and this session will present a real choice: A comprehensive and sequential strategy for eliminating deficits and debt by reversing and eliminating the systemic problems that were built into the Federal Budgeting Process in 1974.

Session 3 – Solutions for Reigning In the Unauthorized Expansion of the Federal Government:

Presented by the founders of the Patrick Henry Caucus. http://www.thepatrickhenrycaucus.org/

Session 4 – Solutions to Intrusive Government Interference in Education:

Presented by Bruno Behrend, Director of the Center for School Reform, The Heartland Institute, Chicago, ILhttp://www.heartland.org/about/profileresults.html?profile=9B1D98727001E6461A5F2A122FC9B19D&directory=0490F571009CFDBBCAA4E62B8A3EBAE2

Session 5 – Solutions for the Unintended Effects of Government Regulations on Foreign Policy:

Presented by Frank Anderson Sr., President and CEO of the Middle East Policy Council, Retired CIA Bureau Chief, Washington, D.C. http://www.mepc.org/media-resources

Session 6 - Recognizing a True Education When You See It:

Presented by Hugh Gorgeon, Regional Director of Challenger Schools, Salt Lake City, Utahhttp://www.challengerschool.com/

3rd element: “TOWN HALL” LUNCH:

The freshman Congressmen will be the guests of honor at a Town Hall Lunch where you will mingle and dine with the Freshman themselves, plus the expert speakers, and your fellow grassroots activists. This lunch will also feature a special presentation to iCaucus endorsed representatives.


Why December 18th?

While Dec. 18th is pretty close to Christmas, it's the earliest date that Chaffetz could commit to meet with the freshman, and the last opportunity for grassroots activists to meet with the freshmen-elect before they get bombarded by special interest groups in Washington.

Cost of the event:

Because this is so close to Christmas, we have worked hard to keep the cost absolutely as low as possible:

________________________

Option 1, Full day plus lunch: $25.00

Includes attendance pass to the Chaffetz Keynote Caucus, plus all six Round Table sessions, plus the Townhall Lunch with the Congressmen...in short, everything is included.

To reserve your spot and purchase Option 1, click the link below: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=66ZFM6AF9XRSY
_____________________________­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­
Option 2, Full day but skip the lunch: $15.00
Includes attendance pass to the Chaffetz Keynote Caucus, plus all six Round Table sessions, but no lunch To reserve your spot and purchase Option 2, click the link below: https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=EY2EJR8T2DEKU
Thank you! Frank Anderson - frank@icaucus.orgCo-founder,
Independence Caucus
Join Independence Caucus and make a difference.
(385) 204-1796 ~ www.icaucus.org